Story · ストーリー
Arpan Debnath
- Now
- Webflow Developer & Web Designer at Remedo
- Building
- A J.TEST-style Japanese-learning app, and an MBTI community app on the side
- Based
- India · UTC+5:30 · open to relocating to Japan, Singapore, Malaysia or within India
How I ended up here

2023
Graphic design at Remedo
I never sat down and decided to become “a designer who also builds AI pipelines.” It happened one repetitive Tuesday at a time. I started at Remedo, a healthcare-tech platform, making social graphics and motion loops, and the throughline ever since has been the same instinct: get closer to the whole pipeline, not just the slice with my name on it.
2023–2025
Design to deployment, one person
That's how graphic design turned into UI/UX, and how UI/UX turned into owning design-to-deployment end to end: wireframes and high-fidelity design in Figma, production builds directly in Webflow, no developer handoff in between. I ship what I design, and it matches pixel-for-pixel, because the same person is doing both halves.
2025–
Building the tools
The automation habit came from exactly the same place. Once you're responsible for the whole pipeline, the boring, repetitive parts of it become impossible to ignore, so instead of doing them faster by hand, I started building tools that do them instead. Grammar QA that used to eat half a workday now takes less time than a coffee break. It's less a philosophy than a pattern: hit the same wall enough times, and eventually you build a door.
A few things I actually believe
Ship it yourself, or don't design it that way.
If a design can't survive contact with a real build, it isn't finished; it's a suggestion. Zero-handoff isn't a productivity flex, it's the only way I trust the output.
If you're doing it a third time, build a tool instead.
Every automation system I've shipped started as the same manual task, done enough times to become unbearable: the QA passes, the SEO/ADA audits, the data checks. None of them were clever ideas. They were me refusing to do the same thing a fourth time.
A system should outlive the person who built it.
The Figma taxonomy, the QC framework, the audit pipelines: none of them need me personally to keep running. That's the actual test of whether something's a system, or just a habit with my name on it.
michi · the path
The Japan of it all
I've been chipping away at Japanese for a while (JLPT N5 down, N4 in progress) and the honest long-term goal is a career in Japan's design industry. Something about the precision and restraint in how design gets made there lines up with how I already like to work, which is what made the studying stick instead of fading out like most New Year's resolutions.
That said, I'm not gatekeeping this whole site around it. If a good, English-speaking team wanted to hire me tomorrow, in Japan or anywhere else, I'd take the call. Japan is the direction I'm walking, not a condition I'm attaching to saying yes.
The work, one line each
- Webflow Builds, Figma to Live Figma to live Webflow, same person, no handoff, for eight clients in the UK and USA.6 + 2sites built + major redesigns
- Design System & Asset Infrastructure A real taxonomy for 4,000+ assets across 15+ Figma repositories, now built on by other teams.3×faster asset retrieval
- AI Website Grammar QA System Reads the live site, fixes copy inside guardrails, and only flags the genuinely weird cases.<30 minper site, was 4–6 hrs
- Tech SEO & Accessibility Audit System Audits the live site, writes the fixes and pushes them live; accessibility is now a standard launch step.30 min–2 hrsper site, was 6–9 hrs
- Functional QA & Responsive Testing Crawl, Lighthouse and a test pass go to the AI, which fixes what it finds; Playwright checks five breakpoints.Hoursper site, was days
That's the story so far
If the next chapter looks like your team, a role or a project that needs design and build without a handoff, I'd like to hear about it.